August 3, 2026

​​

​​

Statement regarding Announcement of Share Acquisition by

Former RWDM President Thierry Dailly

 

 

To the Supporters of RWDM,

 

As detailed below, in our comprehensive account of RWDM's annual licensing application, the Board of Directors made sure to fully fund the Division 1B maintenance of RWDM in 2026, while also making it clear that all board members, including myself, were highly committed to a sale to of the club to an attractive, well-funded ownership group. While we were unsuccessful in maintaining our 1B license, we remain committed to a change-of-control transaction.

​

We take note of the highly publicized announcement of our former President Thierry Dailly, who has stated that he has acquired the shares of RWDM which may have been owned by Eagle Football Holdings Bidco Limited. He also stated that he is now the sole (100%) shareholder of RWDM, a statement which just cannot possibly be true.

​

Neither the Board of Directors of RWDM, nor I (as President and significant shareholder of RWDM), have received any documentation from Mr. Dailly or Eagle Bidco which would support Mr. Dailly's claims of ownership.

​

Regarding RWDM's current ownership, it should be recalled that RWDM completed two significant capital increases, in 2023 and 2024, both of which are easily confirmed through public records, which materially impacted the ownership of Eagle Football Holdings Bidco Limited.

​

The capital increases were funded by myself in 2023, and by football club affiliates of Eagle Bidco in 2024. It is true that such newly issued shares were intended to be transferred to Eagle Bidco, in connection with our planned group-wide IPO, however such transfers were subject to a number of material conditions precedent and were never consummated. The shareholder group would therefore consist of myself, Eagle Bidco, Olympique Lyonnais and SAF Botafogo.  Eagle Bidco, therefore, could not have entered into a transaction with Mr. Dailly which would result in his achievement of a 100% shareholder interest in RWDM. 

 

Furthermore, we are certain that Eagle Bidco’s administrators, at Cork Gully, would not have represented and conveyed to Mr. Dailly a majority ownership interest in RWDM. We are certain that Mr. Dailly’s contract with Eagle Bidco would be limited to a sale of Eagle Bidco’s “right, title and interest, if any” in RWDM, without making any representation of what that interest would actually be (as Cork Gully would not have known).  It is certainly possible that Mr. Dailly now owns the shares of Eagle Bidco, representing a minority interest, though we know this could not represent a majority interest, and we (nor the public) have seen no evidence of purchase documentation thus far.

​

Mr. Dailly has been invited to produce documentation of the transaction he claims would have established his increased ownership. After repeated attempts to get in touch with Mr. Dailly, directly, and through his lawyers, RWDM has received no response to accommodate our requests for proof of ownership. We, as the Board and management of RWDM, find it hard to believe that Mr. Dailly was able to take-over all local management processes, including RWDM's official communication platforms, and announce a completed 100% take-over.  We also find it unnecessary for Mr. Dailly to have forcibly removed a Board that was incredibly willing to support, even inviting of Mr. Dailly, to take-over the club. 

​

It should be clear that the Board of Directors has repeatedly encouraged Mr. Dailly to make a proper bid to take-over the club, as we understand this might be popular with RWDM supporters.

​

Lastly, as no other shareholder of RWDM was notified of an assembly and vote of the shareholders, the Board can only view this reported shareholders' meeting as not having occurred. Again, we encourage Mr. Dailly to make a proposal to re-take the reigns of RWDM, by respecting all creditors and shareholders of RWDM, and by following proper protocols of corporate governance and Belgium law.

​

In the meantime, and until documentation is produced that definitively demonstrates a change-of-control has occurred, the Board of Directors of RWDM, especially in this time of a court-monitored restructuring process, will continue to perform its duties to assure the viability and continuity of RWDM.

 

 

________________________

​

​

June 19, 2026

​

​

RWDM Statement - License Commission Preparation and Decision

 

 

The purpose of this communication is to provide RWDM supporters with an unprecedented level of transparency into the facts, circumstances and extremal factors that, since June 29 of 2025, have all but assured the demotion of RWDM to the 3rd division of Belgian football.

 

 

________________________

 

As painful as demotion to the 3rd division may be, RWDM would inform our supporters that the management team and board, while limited in its powers, did everything possible to maintain its position in Division 1B (the 2nd division of Belgian football). The board, however, could not deliver the attention of the court-appointed administrators of Eagle Football Bidco, which was required to satisfy the license commission's desire for a change-of-control.

 

That said, a significant cash infusion, combined with the heroic effort of the management team, was able to prevent demotion to the 5th division, which surely would have been fatal for the club.

 

All player salaries, employee salaries, taxes and operating expenses have been paid, and the sporting project of RWDM will be funded with a singular ambition, to achieve a promotion and return to professional football in Belgium. 

 

________________________

 

 

Background

 

Firstly, it should be made clear that RWDM leadership demonstrated a level of financial support for our annual license application, that under normal circumstances would have assured our maintenance in the 2nd division.…but these are not normal circumstances. 

 

The on-going civil war within Eagle Football, beginning with the unilateral and illegal rupture of our multi-club business model by the current leadership of Olympique Lyonnais, has left RWDM saddled with an unpaid receivable from the French club that far exceeds the challenges that we face.  The refusal to honor payables, impacting both RWDM and Eagle’s Botafogo in Brazil, is being celebrated as shrewd financial discipline, in France, but only so one community can thrive at the expense of others.

 

In such a circumstance, we understand that the license committee would have been open-minded to any source of capital, so long as it would be accompanied by a change-of-control transaction. Absent such a change-of-control, away from Eagle Football, we knew our license would be in jeopardy, regardless of how clear it was that we could afford to fund the manageable budget of the 2026/27 season.

 

So, for now, we would like to provide you with a full picture of our license application, including the details of recent financial investments, and going forward commitments, that were sufficient to secure our placement in the 3rd division, as an economically viable football club, which can position for a return to professional football.  Were it not for the hard work of our management team, and a significant cash infusion from our Board in the days before the licensing hearing, RWDM would surely have been relegated to the 5th division of Belgian football, effectively a sporting death.

 

​

The Fundamental Pillars of our License Application

 

​

The License Commission looks at two economic concepts, Viability and Continuity

 

• Viability:

  • To satisfy ‘viability’, the license commission made it clear that RWDM needed to satisfy approximately €2.0 million of critical payables for such items as player salaries, employee salaries, taxes, suppliers and payables to other football clubs;

  • If RWDM proved ‘viability’, we would be assured of placement in the 3rd division, with the legal ability to retain our athletes (under contract) and position for a return to professional football;

  • If RWDM could not prove ‘viability’, our entire squad would be entitled to break their contracts and leave, immediately killing the sporting project and the company as all essential assets of the club would evaporate;

​

• Continuity:​

  • In the case of RWDM, we needed to show at least €5 million of funding available for the club, an amount which is quite affordable;

  • Further, even with a significant investment from the Board of RWDM, the message from the licensing commission made clear they expected Eagle Bidco (led by the law firm of Cork Gully) to agree to a change-of-control.

  • To satisfy ‘continuity’, RWDM would need to show that ownership had the wealth (or the funding) necessary to finance the operating budget of the club, with a reasonable amount of excess funds to anticipate unexpected financial impacts;

 

 

What did we deliver?...Cash and a qualified Buyer

 

•  On Viability, to prevent the administrative relegation to the 5th division, Wyndcrest Holdings, and affiliate of our board member John Textor, made a direct cash investment of €2.0 million on May 18, 2026, such amount adding to approximately €2.5 million funded by Wyndcrest during the final months of the 2025/26 season.

  • RWDM, therefore, was able to pay player salaries, employee salaries, suppliers, taxes and other critical payments, fully catching up on operating payments which had previously been delayed.

  • Moreover, this allowed RWDM to report the club to be in full compliance with its facilities/stadium agreements, and other operating agreements - the cash injection, therefore, enabling the club to report to the licensing commission that all critical requirements for Viability had been met;

​

• On Continuity, RWDM management presented three (3) ownership groups, as alternatives for 2026/27 and beyond:

  • Preferred Buyer: Global sports-media investment group, based in Paris, and backed by Ultra-High-Net-Worth individual

  • • The Board, based on pre-existing relationships, recruited this buyer candidate to purchase RWDM, as the Board believed the club would fit well into their existing portfolio of sports and media assets;

    • The Board was well acquainted with the buyer’s network of related companies, which is supported by a well-funded Hong Kong publicly-listed ‘parent’ company, and a Paris-based affiliate as the ‘buyer’;

    • The buyer produced a confirmation letter from one of the world’s most prestigious private banks, based in Zurich, assuring the license commission of the financial capabilities of the private backer of the buyer entity;

    • The buyer also produced an enforceable ‘comfort letter’ guarantee, and a shareholder financing agreement, which RWDM hoped would assure the committee that RWDM (with the license) would again be a heavily funded football club;

    • The buyer and RWDM also produced a comprehensive (and executed) Share Purchase Agreement (‘SPA’), and RWDM recommended this buyer to the commission in its request for the license;

    • Regrettably, in spite of aggressive efforts to procure a response from Cork Gully (Eagle Bidco), RWDM was not able to obtain the necessary consent that would be required to consummate the SPA, and the license commission viewed the change-of-control as speculative and unreliable.​​

  • Alternate Buyer: Local supporter group, to include former owner, Thierry Dailley, as a minority partner;

    • RWDM learned of this offer, indirectly, from the administrators of Eagle Bidco, very late in the licensing process (May 15, 2026);

    • The offer was a zero-cash proposal, that required numerous third-party concessions that could not possibly be delivered in a timely manner, so the “TD Group” proposal was not credible and could not be presented as reliable during RWDM’s presentation ot the license commission;

    • RWDM leadership did meet with the largest (majority) investor of the TD Group, on the night before the hearing, and the board of RWDM came to view this individual as a highly credible business-owner and passionate supporter of RWDM;

    • RWDM, even with no financial information available from the TD Group, presented this group to the commission (as an alternate) as an attractive potential owner of the club;

  • Transition Option: Existing Board (John Textor) in transition to the Preferred Buyer

    • With a strong belief that the above referenced Paris-based sports-media buyer would consummate the purchase of RWDM within 3-5 days of the approval of the license, RWDM management proposed that existing director, John Textor, be relied upon by the licensing commission as the party responsible to fund the club’s 2026-27 2nd division season;

    • Serving only in his capacity as a director of the club, with no legal obligation to do so, Mr. Textor caused Wyndcrest Holdings to fund €2.0 million in cash on May 18 in recognition of a moral obligation to help RWDM meet its critical obligations;

    • Including the above cash infusion, Mr. Textor has been the only source of external financing for the club, having injected roughly €4.5 million, since late 2025 (all while knowing that he would likely never be the owner of the club);

    • Mr. Textor also delivered to the licensing commission an enforceable ‘comfort letter’ commitment to fund the full 2026/27 season of RWDM, supported further by a financial report (including third-party appraisals of assets), confirming Mr. Textor’s financial capabilities to meet such obligations.

    • RWDM is informed that the licensing commission would not consider Mr. Textor’s offer of financial support as relevant to the application for a ‘1B’ license, given his historical connection to Eagle Football. 

 

  

Why did we fail?

 

We delivered Viability, with a significant cash infusion from our Board, catching up fully on all deferred operating expenses.

 

We delivered Continuity, with 3 strong buyer alternatives, with two that demonstrated significant documentation of financial capability, plus a local group that would likely have been able to do the same.

 

We could NOT deliver the cooperation of Cork Gully, administrators at Eagle Football Bidco, to assure the change-of-control, which gave the licensing commission enough uncertainty as to deny our license.

 

To conclude, RWDM sincerely believes that the cooperation of Cork Gully, which required little more than an administrative response, would have been sufficient to convince the license commission that RWDM was fully funded and likely to complete the proposed change-of-control transaction.

 

As a result of this lack of cooperation, RWDM was likely to be demoted to the 5th division of Belgian football, if not for an immediate injection of cash.

 

Thanks, however, to the hard work of the management team, and the financial support of the board, RWDM was able to secure placement in the 3rd division, with a restructuring and sporting strategy that can now compete for an immediate return to Belgian professional football.